Home Datasets Solutions Industries CodeData Resources About Contact
Exclusive Private Codebase Data

Private Codebases. Real Tasks. Exclusive Data.

DATALENT owns private codebases across 20+ domains and languages. We extract 2000+ structured LLM training tasks from each one — PR review pairs, bug-fix sequences, code explanations, reasoning traces. Data your competitors cannot access because we own the source.

2,000+ tasks per codebase
20+ domains
15+ languages
task_extractor.py
pr_review.json
output.jsonl
01# DATALENT CodeData — Private Codebase Task Extractor
02
03def extract_tasks(repo_path, task_limit=2000):
04    """Extract LLM training tasks from private codebase"""
05    tasks = []
06    for pr in scan_pull_requests(repo_path):
07        tasks += build_review_pairs(pr)
08    for bug in scan_bug_fixes(repo_path):
09        tasks += build_fix_sequence(bug)
10    return quality_filter(tasks)[:task_limit]
// Tasks generated from this codebase
PR Review auth_middleware.py — explain the security tradeoff in this PR diff
Bug Fix race_condition.go — identify and fix the concurrent map write
Explain query_optimizer.sql — explain why this index scan is faster
Reasoning cache_invalidation.rs — walk through the eviction strategy step by step
Test Gen payment_processor.py — generate edge-case unit tests for this function
2,847
Tasks Generated
99%
QA Pass Rate
6
Task Types
0
Tasks Per Codebase
0
Domains Covered
0
Languages
0
Task Categories
How It Works

From Private Codebase to LLM Training Tasks

DATALENT owns the source. We run the extraction. You receive production-quality task datasets with no access to the underlying codebase required.

Step 01
🔒
Private Codebase — Owned by DATALENT

We own and maintain private codebases across 20+ domains — finance systems, healthcare platforms, logistics engines, developer tooling, and more. These are not scraped from GitHub. They are not synthetic. They are real proprietary codebases that no other data provider has access to. The exclusivity of the source is the product.

Step 02
Automated Task Extraction Pipeline

Our extraction pipeline scans each codebase systematically — pull requests, commit histories, bug reports, code reviews, and function documentation. For every valuable signal, we generate a structured training task: an instruction, the relevant code context, and a high-quality response. Each codebase produces a minimum of 2000 tasks across six task categories.

Step 03
🚀
QA, Format, and Deliver

Every generated task passes automated quality checks — response completeness, code validity, instruction clarity — followed by expert human review. Tasks are delivered in JSONL format compatible with OpenAI fine-tuning, HuggingFace Datasets, and all major LLM training frameworks. Data cards, schema documentation, and version metadata included.

Task Categories

Six Types of LLM Training Tasks

Each codebase yields tasks across all six categories. Buyers can purchase the full set or filter by category to target specific model capabilities.

PR Review
Pull Request Review Pairs

Real PR diffs with expert review comments. The model learns to read code changes, identify issues, suggest improvements, and explain the reasoning behind review decisions — exactly as a senior engineer would.

~400 tasks per codebase
Bug Fix
Bug Identification & Fix Sequences

Real bugs from production history paired with their fixes. Each task includes the buggy code, the error context, the fix, and an explanation of why the bug existed. Trains models to debug, not just pattern-match.

~380 tasks per codebase
Explain
Code Explanation Tasks

Complex functions, architectural patterns, and non-obvious implementation decisions paired with clear, accurate explanations at multiple levels of depth. Trains models to explain code to both technical and non-technical audiences.

~420 tasks per codebase
Reasoning
Step-by-Step Reasoning Traces

Multi-step reasoning walkthroughs for complex code logic — algorithm analysis, performance tradeoff decisions, architecture choices. Each task preserves the complete chain of thought that leads to the conclusion. Critical for training code-reasoning models.

~350 tasks per codebase
Test Gen
Test Generation Tasks

Real functions paired with comprehensive test suites written by the original developers. Tasks include both the generation instruction and the expected test output — including edge cases, boundary conditions, and error scenarios that only production experience reveals.

~280 tasks per codebase
Refactor
Refactoring & Improvement Tasks

Before-and-after code pairs from real refactoring commits. Each task includes the original code, the improved version, and a structured explanation of what was improved and why. Covers readability, performance, maintainability, and design pattern improvements.

~170 tasks per codebase
Sample Output

What a CodeData Task Looks Like

Every task is a self-contained training example with instruction, code context, and a verified high-quality response. Ready to load directly into your fine-tuning pipeline.

Task Sample auth_service/middleware.py — PR #2847 QA VERIFIED
// Input (code + instruction)
# Task type: PR Review
# Instruction:
"Review this diff and explain the security tradeoff between the old and new token validation approach."
# Code context (diff):
- validate_token(token, strict=False)
+ validate_token(token, strict=True,
                 expiry_check=True)
+ rotate_token(user_id)
// Expected response (training target)
The change enforces strict validation where previously tokens could pass with relaxed checks.

Security gain: Adding expiry_check=True prevents replay attacks using expired tokens — a common attack vector the previous implementation was vulnerable to.

Tradeoff: rotate_token() adds ~12ms per auth call. Acceptable for a security-critical path. The reviewer should verify this does not break stateless client assumptions.

// Response verified by senior engineer annotator
Why It Matters

Why Private Codebase Data Is Different

Any team can scrape GitHub. Only DATALENT can sell tasks from private codebases your competitors have never seen.

🔒
Exclusive Source — Zero Public Overlap

Our private codebases are not in any public dataset. Models trained on CodeData learn from code patterns, decisions, and problem-solving approaches that have never appeared in pre-training data — which means genuine capability improvement rather than memorisation of patterns the model already knows.

🌏
Real Production Code — Not Toy Examples

Public GitHub code skews toward tutorial repositories, academic projects, and clean examples. Our private codebases come from real production systems — with the messy architecture decisions, legacy constraints, and hard-won engineering judgments that real software contains. Models trained on this data perform better in real deployment environments.

🧠
Reasoning Traces from Real Decisions

The most valuable training signal in our tasks is not the code itself — it is the reasoning that accompanied real engineering decisions: why this approach was chosen over alternatives, what tradeoffs were considered, what the review caught that the author missed. This decision context is invisible in public code and only exists in private repositories with rich commit and review history.

📈
Multi-Domain Coverage Across Languages

A model trained only on Python web services will struggle with Go microservices or Java enterprise systems. Our codebases span 20+ domains — finance, healthcare, logistics, developer tooling, embedded systems, data infrastructure — and 15+ languages, giving your model exposure to the full diversity of real-world software engineering practice.

Expert-Verified Responses

Every task response is verified by a senior software engineer before it enters the training set. We do not auto-generate responses and assume they are correct. Incorrect reasoning in training data is worse than no training data — it teaches the model to be confidently wrong. Our QA pass rate on code tasks is 99%, maintained by human expert review at the response level.

📦
Ready for Your Fine-Tuning Pipeline

Tasks ship as JSONL in the instruction-response format used by OpenAI fine-tuning, Axolotl, LLaMA-Factory, and every major fine-tuning framework. HuggingFace Datasets compatible. Each delivery includes a data card documenting task distribution, language breakdown, domain coverage, and known limitations. Versioned for reproducible training runs.

Coverage

Languages & Domains

Our private codebases span the languages and domains where production software actually lives — not just the languages that dominate tutorials.

Programming Languages

Python
JavaScript
Go
Java
TypeScript
Rust
C++
SQL
Kotlin
Swift
C#
Ruby
Shell
Scala
+ more

Codebase Domains

Healthcare Systems
Finance & Payments
Developer Tooling
Data Infrastructure
Logistics & Supply Chain
Security & Auth
E-Commerce Platforms
ML Infrastructure
IoT & Embedded
API Platforms
Enterprise SaaS
+ more domains
FAQ

CodeData Questions

What makes this different from scraping GitHub for code training data?
Three things. First, our codebases are private — the code has never appeared in any public dataset, so training on it adds genuine capability rather than reinforcing patterns the model already learned from pre-training data. Second, GitHub code skews heavily toward tutorials, academic projects, and clean examples. Our codebases are from real production systems with the complexity, legacy decisions, and hard engineering tradeoffs that real software contains. Third, we extract the reasoning context — commit messages, review comments, bug reports — that explains why code was written the way it was. That reasoning signal is invisible when you only have the code itself.
Do buyers get access to the underlying codebase?
No. Buyers receive the task dataset — the structured instruction-response pairs extracted from the codebase. The underlying codebase remains private and is not transferred. This is intentional: the value is in the high-quality training tasks, not in the raw code. It also means we can maintain the exclusivity of the source across multiple buyers — each buyer gets the same tasks, but none have access to the proprietary codebase that generated them.
What format do CodeData tasks ship in?
Tasks are delivered as JSONL files in the standard instruction-response format used by OpenAI fine-tuning, Axolotl, LLaMA-Factory, and all major LLM training frameworks. Each record contains: task type, instruction, code context, expected response, codebase domain, programming language, and a quality score. HuggingFace Datasets compatible out of the box. We also provide schema documentation and a data card per delivery.
How is code quality and response accuracy verified?
Every task response is reviewed by a senior software engineer with domain expertise matching the codebase. Automated checks run first — code validity, instruction completeness, response length and structure — and flag tasks for human review. Tasks that fail either automated or human QA are regenerated, not shipped with caveats. We maintain a 99% QA pass rate, which means the 1% that fails never reaches a buyer.
Can I request tasks focused on a specific language or domain?
Yes. When purchasing, you can filter by programming language, codebase domain, and task type. If your use case requires a concentration of tasks from a specific domain — for example, a financial services LLM that needs primarily Python and SQL tasks from fintech codebases — we can structure delivery accordingly. Enterprise buyers can also request dedicated extraction runs prioritising specific task types from specific domain codebases.

Code Intelligence Your Competitors Can't Buy.

Our private codebases are not available anywhere else. The LLM training tasks we extract from them are not reproducible from public data. Request CodeData before your competitors do.

Request CodeData → Browse All Datasets